Skip to content
Not faster decisions. Decisions the organization learns from.
You have written procedures for expense reports.
You have written nothing about how you decide.
I want to sit on that for a minute, because it is the single strangest thing about how companies actually work, and almost nobody notices it.
Somewhere in your company, a document explains how to submit a receipt. There is an onboarding checklist. A safety procedure has a laminated copy on a wall.
And there is nothing, anywhere, about which customers you walk away from and why. Nothing about when you raise prices and what tells you it is time. Nothing about how you can tell a good performer has stopped growing, six months before it shows up in their numbers.
That is the actual operating knowledge of the business. And it has never left one person’s head.
Why this is different from what you think it is
When people hear this, they usually reach for documentation. A knowledge management project. Somebody interviews the CEO for forty hours and produces a binder nobody opens.
That is not what I am talking about, and it does not work.
The problem is not that your judgment is undocumented. The problem is that your judgment is tacit. You cannot write it down because you do not experience it as a process. You experience it as knowing.
“Something felt off about that deal.” You are not being vague. That is genuinely how it arrives.
But underneath the feeling there are signals. Real ones. The way the buyer answered a specific question. How fast they agreed to the price. Who was not in the room. You have seen that pattern enough times that your brain stopped showing you the work.
The signals are recoverable. You just have to catch them in the moment.
The four-minute habit
Here is the whole method, and it is not a project.
The next time you make a call your team would not have made, before you move to the next thing, spend four minutes answering three questions out loud, in the room, with them there.
What did I see that you did not?
What was I weighing against what?
What would have changed my answer?
That is the transfer. Not a binder. A habit.
The third question does the most work, by the way. It is where you accidentally teach people your actual decision boundary, which is the thing they can never learn by watching you be right.
And then the other half
The habit above gets your judgment out. This next part makes the company itself smarter, which is a different thing.
After a real decision, any decision that mattered, run four questions with the team.
What did we expect would happen?
What actually happened?
Which assumption turned out to be wrong?
What should we remember next time?
Four questions. Run consistently, on real decisions, they turn one person’s pattern recognition into organizational judgment. That is not a faster company. That is a company that compounds.
Most organizations never do this, and the reason is almost funny. Everybody is too busy making the next decision to learn anything from the last one.
The honest close
I said at the start of this month that technology changes the container, and your value lives in what survives the container.
Here is where that lands.
Your judgment survives. It was never the thing at risk. But judgment that cannot travel is not an asset; it is a dependency, and it leaves the building when you do.
This is the hardest of the four weeks to do alone, and the reason is structural. The person whose judgment you need to extract is also the person running the company. You cannot interview yourself. You cannot see your own pattern recognition from the inside, because from the inside it just looks like being right.
That’s where an outsider helps, and I will leave it there.
Lisa
If this made you realize something important still lives only in your head, message me. Tell me what it is.